Cooperation in the Blue Pacific Learn More
Programs & Links.
Latest News
Vares-Lum Assumes Command at DKI APCSS
HONOLULU –Retired US Army Maj. Gen. Suzanne (Suzy) Puanani Vares-Lum joined the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies (DKI APCSS) this week as the Center’s new Director. The transition occurred during an Assumption of Command ceremony held on Monday, which was attended by close family and friends and DKI APCSS staff. During the ceremony, Vares-Lum, an alumna of the Center, remarked that it felt like coming home. Not only is she an alumna of two DKI APCSS courses, but she also started her Army career in this building when it used to be a reserve center. Born and raised in Hawaiʻi, she served 34 years in all three components of the U.S. Army—the Army National Guard, Regular Army, and Army Reserve—retiring as a Major General in 2021. Vares-Lum is an alumna of the Cen
Dialogue #35 Indo-Pacific Humanity and Geopolitics
In Dialogue 35: Indo-Pacific Humanity and Geopolitics, humanitarian adviser Jonathan Robinson explores the intersection of humanitarian aid and geopolitics in the Indo-Pacific. From navigating aid in politically sensitive areas to the impact of great power competition and China’s hospital ship ecosystem, this episode delves into critical challenges shaping regional humanitarian efforts.
New article on Non-State Actors and Irregular Warfare by Sam Mullins
In "The Role of Non-State Actors as Proxies in Irregular Warfare and Malign State Influence," Dr. Sam Mullins examines how states like China and Russia leverage non-state actors (NSAs) to conduct irregular warfare, employing tactics that blur the lines between peace and conflict. These NSAs engage in activities ranging from persistent low-level operations aimed at undermining adversaries' institutions to more aggressive actions that challenge the sovereignty of other nations.
Dialogue #36 Korea’s Martial Law Fallout
South Korea’s Democratic Turmoil: A Test of Resilience South Korea, often hailed as a beacon of democracy in Asia, finds itself navigating a profound political crisis that has raised questions about its democratic stability and governance. The impeachment of President Yoon Suk-yeol following his December 3rd declaration of martial law has sent shockwaves across the nation and the region. While the swift response from South Korea’s institutions and the public demonstrates the strength of its democratic framework, the crisis also highlights vulnerabilities that demand attention. This critical issue was the focus of Dialogue Episode 36, where I had the privilege of hosting DKI APCSS Professor Dr. Lami Kim to explore the broader implications of this historic crisis. Reflecting on the situation, Dr. Kim observed, “President Yoon’s declaration of martial law was not a spontaneous move; it was premeditated. His aides testified that he had been discussing the option for months, believing it was the only way to tackle his mounting political and personal challenges.” A Premeditated Power Grab President Yoon’s martial law declaration, framed as a response to “pro-North Korean threats” and political unrest, was far from spontaneous. Yoon’s actions, including attempts to dissolve the National Assembly and paralyze democratic institutions, drew comparisons to South Korea’s authoritarian past, particularly Chun Doo-hwan’s 1979 coup. However, the failure of Yoon’s self-coup underscores the evolution of South Korean democracy. Dr. Kim noted, “South Korean citizens have become incredibly mature in their democratic practices. Their peaceful and well-organized protests show the strength of civil society, which, alongside a free press and nonviolent dissent, helped ensure the failure of Yoon’s self-coup.”
